🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Industry experts noted the seeming leak could boost AI companies looking for data to develop their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a third party scraped public metadata and employed illicit tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large digital files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would probably be used for training AI models.

“Educating models on pirated data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. He added it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between artists, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a government proposal to let AI companies utilize protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, research and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.